Describe the end-to-end flow
Walk through, in plain terms, how a committee overlay decision moves from proposal to capture to propagation to audit — and what fails when any step is skipped.
One human decision, six downstream systems, zero re-entry. How a committee overlay change gets captured, propagated, and audited — and why the audit trail is the thing that makes the whole flow defensible.
Start here
Walk through, in plain terms, how a committee overlay decision moves from proposal to capture to propagation to audit — and what fails when any step is skipped.
Name every system that has to be updated when an overlay changes — the guidelines engine, the LOS, the rate sheet, training, customer collateral, and the audit log.
Explain how an auditor reconstructs a change from the system back to the committee decision — and why "reconstructable in one query" is the design target.
Three flow ideas
The committee makes the call, and the call gets recorded in a structured, machine-readable format — product, criterion, change, rationale, effective date, decision ID. Capture is what turns a meeting into a system change.
The captured decision is pushed — by agents, not people — to every downstream surface that needs to know. The engine, the LOS, the rate sheet, training materials, customer-facing collateral. No human re-entry.
Every change to every system carries the decision ID back to the committee record. Reconstructable, traceable, defensible. The audit trail is the thing that makes the whole flow safe to automate.
Where the work happens
Where the decision is made and captured. The meeting output is a structured decision record — not minutes, not an email recap. The capture format is what makes the rest of the flow possible.
The decisionWhere the change propagates. Agents read the structured decision, identify every downstream surface that needs updating, and execute the updates — with the decision ID embedded in every change.
The propagationLOS, rate sheet, guidelines engine, training materials, customer-facing collateral, audit log. Every system that has to know about the change. Each one updated, dated, and tied back to the decision.
The reachWorking inside the flow
Product, criterion, change, rationale, effective date, decision ID. If the committee decision can't be written in that format, it isn't ready to propagate — it's still a discussion.
Direct edits to the engine, the LOS, or the rate sheet — without going through capture and propagation — break the audit trail. The shortcut today is the audit failure next quarter.
Disagreements about "what did we decide?" get resolved by reading the captured decision and the propagation log — not by reconstructing memory from the meeting.
If a decision is conditional, multi-stage, or doesn't map cleanly to the capture template, that's a signal — escalate before propagating. Don't force-fit a non-fitting decision.
Even when it's tempting. Especially when it's tempting. The audit log only works if every change carries a decision ID — and a direct edit doesn't.
Prompt upgrade
We decided in committee yesterday to tighten gift funds at 95%+ LTV. Sarah, let the LOs know; Mike, update the engine when you can.
Flow-ready prompt
Decision ID: OVR-2026-007 · Product: Conventional, 95%+ LTV · Change: Cap gift funds at 50% of down payment (was: no cap) · Rationale: Risk-weighted file data shows higher default on >50% gift-funded loans · Effective: 2026-04-01 · Committee approval: 2026-03-15 · Propagate to: Guidelines Engine, LOS, Rate Sheet, Training, Customer Collateral, Audit Log.
Best patterns
A new restriction or condition the committee adds. The most common flow type — and the one where the structured-capture habit pays off most.
An old restriction the committee decides is no longer needed. Often skipped or done informally — which is exactly why the audit trail breaks. Retirement deserves the same flow as creation.
The most error-prone flow — partial updates where one surface gets the change and another doesn't. The propagation map exists to make this kind of partial update impossible.
Rate volatility, agency announcement, regulatory deadline. Fast flow — same capture format, same propagation, just compressed timing. Speed is no excuse for breaking the audit trail.
Flow checks
Walk a change through the system
Use real committee decisions where you can. The habit is forged on real changes, not hypothetical ones.
You've finished this module when you can name every downstream surface a committee decision touches, capture a decision in the structured format on the first try, and read an audit-trail entry back to its committee record in under thirty seconds.
Propagation map
Committee decision · captured
OVR-2026-007Conv · 95%+ LTVCap gift funds at 50% of DP (was: no cap)Risk-weighted data shows higher default on >50% gift-funded loans2026-04-012026-03-15What the agent does
Audit entry
Six surfaces, six audit entries, one decision ID stitching them together. An auditor walks in and asks
"why did this loan get flagged in the LOS?" — and gets back to OVR-2026-007 in one query.
That's the trail.
The reason this flow exists is so that a committee meeting on a Tuesday becomes a system-wide update by Wednesday morning — with no one having to remember to update the rate sheet. That's the magic, and it only works if no one bypasses it.
If you can't trace a system change back to a committee decision in under thirty seconds, the change is invisible to the auditor — and invisible to the auditor is exactly where regulatory problems live.